Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
-
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Has Criterion ever refused to work with a director? I just read over in another thread about a boutique refusing to work with Michael Mann, Kino Classics. I have quite a few of their titles so I won’t criticize that decision too harshly but it made me curious if this was ever an issue for the CC.
- therewillbeblus
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Criterion kinda refused to work with Darran Aronofsky... but they also don't have an Insider freely posting on message boards without a filter. If they refused to work with a director, as I'm sure they've decided to do behind closed doors, we wouldn't hear about it. And that's just professionalism.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:03 amHas Criterion ever refused to work with a director? I just read over in another thread about a boutique refusing to work with Michael Mann, Kino Classics. I have quite a few of their titles so I won’t criticize that decision too harshly but it made me curious if this was ever an issue for the CC.
Before you judge KL too harshly: I believe Mann is notoriously difficult to work with on physical releases, with lots of revisionism, etc. - a similar rep to William Friedkin. KL just had a poor experience with Friedkin on Bug, so perhaps they're simply learning from experience and putting that into practice. At any rate, a better policy than just kissing WKW's feet as he does whatever he wants to precious art under your roof
-
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I don’t have much issue with the transparency on their part, I just wondered how common this is with directors.
-
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:12 am
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
It probably stems from Kino having The Keep under licence and Mann refusing to facilitate its release.
- Buttery Jeb
- Just in it for the game.
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:55 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I don't remember the context, but I do recall that Janus Films/Criterion had a thing about Werner Herzog; and that being the reason why none of his films were given a Criterion release.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:03 amHas Criterion ever refused to work with a director? I just read over in another thread about a boutique refusing to work with Michael Mann, Kino Classics. I have quite a few of their titles so I won’t criticize that decision too harshly but it made me curious if this was ever an issue for the CC.
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Does anyone know the reason Criterion has avoided Herzog?Buttery Jeb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:51 amI don't remember the context, but I do recall that Janus Films/Criterion had a thing about Werner Herzog; and that being the reason why none of his films were given a Criterion release.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:03 amHas Criterion ever refused to work with a director? I just read over in another thread about a boutique refusing to work with Michael Mann, Kino Classics. I have quite a few of their titles so I won’t criticize that decision too harshly but it made me curious if this was ever an issue for the CC.
It is really unfortunate that they passed on the Herzog box opportunity.
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Regarding OCN/Vinegar Syndrome partner labels, Criterion has also licensed This Is Not a Burial, It’s a Resurrection from Dekanalog and Nothing but a Man from The Film Desk and I assume both of these were licensed after they became partner labels. (They also have a bunch of IFC titles but those were clearly licensed before it became an OCN partner label.)
As for director's that Criterion has seemingly rebuffed, Andrew Dominik's extended cut of The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and Tarsem said he approached them about doing The Fall and they weren't interested.
As for director's that Criterion has seemingly rebuffed, Andrew Dominik's extended cut of The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and Tarsem said he approached them about doing The Fall and they weren't interested.
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I thought that WB trashed Dominik’s alternate cuts of Jesse James.dwk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:02 pmRegarding OCN/Vinegar Syndrome partner labels, Criterion has also licensed This Is Not a Burial, It’s a Resurrection from Dekanalog and Nothing but a Man from The Film Desk and I assume both of these were licensed after they became partner labels. (They also have a bunch of IFC titles but those were clearly licensed before it became an OCN partner label.)
As for director's that Criterion has seemingly rebuffed, Andrew Dominik's extended cut of The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and Tarsem said he approached them about doing The Fall and they weren't interested.
Criterion also turned down Martin Rosen’s The Plague Dogs after working on Watership Down, which is just moronic.
Prior to Oscilloscope picking it up, Tom Noonan practically begged Criterion to handle What Happened Was…. Another major head-scratching decision.
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I have no idea, I just recall Roger Deakins pushing for Criterion to release it. I also recall that James Flower tweeted that Arrow had asked WB about it back when they did the deal for Cruising and Alice Sweet Alice and WB said no, so maybe that is something that Arrow picked up now that they have a proper deal with WB.beamish14 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:04 pmI thought that WB trashed Dominik’s alternate cuts of Jesse James.
Criterion also turned down Martin Rosen’s The Plague Dogs after working on Watership Down, which is just moronic.
Prior to Oscilloscope picking it up, Tom Noonan practically begged Criterion to handle What Happened Was…. Another major head-scratching decision.
As for the other two, I wonder if the just found doing Watership Down too much of a headache for some reason. And for the Noonan it could have been something as simple as their schedule was too full. I recall they have said that they try to get a film owned by a person out as quickly as possible compared to studio licensed titles.
Honestly, I think most of these situations probably boils down to them having so many titles under license that they have to turn down some quality films because they just don't have the time.
- jwd5275
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 pm
- Location: SF, CA
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I always got the feeling it wasn't Herzog himself that was the issue, but the fact that he wanted his catalog out and available as quickly and completely as possible. He isn't willing to wait for the inevitable trickle of Criterion releases, nor willing the break a few gems out of a catalog package for Criterion to handle.kekid wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:37 pmDoes anyone know the reason Criterion has avoided Herzog?Buttery Jeb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:51 amI don't remember the context, but I do recall that Janus Films/Criterion had a thing about Werner Herzog; and that being the reason why none of his films were given a Criterion release.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:03 amHas Criterion ever refused to work with a director? I just read over in another thread about a boutique refusing to work with Michael Mann, Kino Classics. I have quite a few of their titles so I won’t criticize that decision too harshly but it made me curious if this was ever an issue for the CC.
It is really unfortunate that they passed on the Herzog box opportunity.
- yoloswegmaster
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Janus is listed as the rightsholder for Cairo Station, and I was also able to confirm with the company that holds the rights to the films of Youssef Chahine that Criterion has the rights to around 20 of his films that have been restored.
- RSTooley
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:35 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I wouldn't say that they refused to work with Ava Duvernay, but they passed on Middle of Nowhere according to the New York Times. Ava goes on to claim in this article that there wasn't a rights issue, but I don't recall Criterion releasing any Lionsgate films at the time. Becker immediately commented that he'd be willing to put out a special edition of the film. Who knows.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:03 amHas Criterion ever refused to work with a director?
-
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
jwd5275 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:48 pmI always got the feeling it wasn't Herzog himself that was the issue, but the fact that he wanted his catalog out and available as quickly and completely as possible. He isn't willing to wait for the inevitable trickle of Criterion releases, nor willing the break a few gems out of a catalog package for Criterion to handle.kekid wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:37 pmDoes anyone know the reason Criterion has avoided Herzog?Buttery Jeb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:51 am
I don't remember the context, but I do recall that Janus Films/Criterion had a thing about Werner Herzog; and that being the reason why none of his films were given a Criterion release.
It is really unfortunate that they passed on the Herzog box opportunity.
Exactly. Anchor Bay released a large number of his titles in rapid succession. It’s an all-or-nothing thing with him
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Funny about the Herzog sets from Shout Factory is that there was an 8 year gap between Volume 1 (July 2014) and Volume 2 (June 2022). So it isn't like they really rushed them all out. (I assume that after the success of the Bergman set, Criterion would be more likely to go for a large box set release if a licensesor was pushing for it and it contained a number of titles they wanted to release.)
- jwd5275
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 pm
- Location: SF, CA
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Both Sembene's Camp de Thiaroye and Emilio Fernandez's Maria Candelaria are now listed on the Film Foundation site as WCP restorations.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I like when Criterion does those twofer releases (standalones) from a director. It's been a while. I can't remember the last time they did
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
1066) Man Push Cart and 1067) Chop Shop by Ramin BahraniFrauBlucher wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 2:37 pmI like when Criterion does those twofer releases (standalones) from a director. It's been a while. I can't remember the last time they did
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Wow. That's over three years ago
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Il Cinema Ritrovato will screen a restored Pépé le Moko. No other details yet. Hopefully this means a Criterion upgrade is on the horizon
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
- johnnysnatchclub7
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:49 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Wes films double confirmed for life.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
- Peacock
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:47 pm
- Location: Scotland
- CSM126
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
- Location: The Room
- Contact:
- RitrovataBlue
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:02 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Hours since this story leaked and Criterion has yet to acknowledge it on social media. It seems the company doesn't want to draw attention to the matter. But then, they've always sort of avoided acknowledging the corporate mantel underneath the bust of Janus...