Twilight Time / Redwind
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Tenia, I doubt they’ve pressed even a thousand copies up front of most of their recent titles, nevermind 3k. I think 500 is Technicolor’s minimum for pressed discs, so very likely some of the more obscure or recent titles only exist in numbers far bellow their contractual threshold
- Luke M
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:21 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
I think they should've went all-in with their limited edition copies and never printed more than 1000 and released some editions with numbers as low as 300. It would've generated a lot of interest from collectors. Instead they do 3000 which doesn't inspire a whole lot of day one pre-ordering.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
The issue is that 3000 wasnt just for limited purposes but also to capture the whole market by allowing the movies to remain in print long enough.
That's why the whole thing is silly since it also was trying to do very different things simultaneously.
Domino, it's indeed very likely they pressed less and less overtime but that also meant facing higher manufacturing costs. I don't know how much that would have weighed in their budget but if that's the case, it's financially even worse than what I thought. I seem to recall 1000 is the usual smallest batch size though but maybe it's less now.
That's why the whole thing is silly since it also was trying to do very different things simultaneously.
Domino, it's indeed very likely they pressed less and less overtime but that also meant facing higher manufacturing costs. I don't know how much that would have weighed in their budget but if that's the case, it's financially even worse than what I thought. I seem to recall 1000 is the usual smallest batch size though but maybe it's less now.
- bugsy_pal
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 1:28 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
I have about 20 TT releases, and got sucked in to the "buy now" thing for a few of them (eg. Journey to the Centre of the Earth - both of their releases of that film).
Thankfully, I wasn't a fan of Carpenter's 'Christine' - I remember there being a frenzy over that title, and 'Fright Night' too - they sold out quickly, to much gnashing of teeth and moaning about scalpers. I was bemused to see that Fright Night was released in my home Australia not long after, for about 10 bucks.
Thankfully, I wasn't a fan of Carpenter's 'Christine' - I remember there being a frenzy over that title, and 'Fright Night' too - they sold out quickly, to much gnashing of teeth and moaning about scalpers. I was bemused to see that Fright Night was released in my home Australia not long after, for about 10 bucks.
- captveg
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
He wasn't even that far off, really - nearly all catalog titles are now sold through specialty labels in the US, either of a studios' own limited runs like Warner Archive, the Universal MODs, Sony MODs, and the Disney Movie Club, or through 3rd parties like Criterion, Kino, Arrow, Shout, etc. The only exceptions are primarily the repackaged-for-4K-UHD evergreen titles. Where Redman was wrong was in artificially limiting these titles to the same 3000, something even they had to adjust higher for a couple titles they were the wrong distributor for. Seems to me the other 3rd party labels made the smarter approach by not disclosing the run size of their titles, allowing them to print more for the best sellers, and likely print far less for the majority of their riskier releases (I recall someone mentioning to me that WB archive keeps their initial batch runs to 300-500 for most titles). With several MGM releases going OOP for Kino and Shout recently it's not as if those models are perfect, either, but they are more consumer friendly in this day and age when probably 90%+ of catalog BD sales are online and they can be purchased from more than two online retailers competing with each other in price.whaleallright wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:45 pmTo be fair, I think Redman was absolutely sincere in his belief that physical media was decisively on its way out, and he wasn't alone in that belief—it was the subject of a zillion articles in Variety etc. I imagine he was pleasantly surprised by the tenacity of Blu-Ray even if it meant their business model ended up being a bit of a miscalculation.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Arrow's batch size usually was 3000 but varied between 2000 and 5000, with exceptions as low as 1000 and as high as 10 000.
I'm quite sure other labels can adapt in similar ways their batch sizes to their releases' expected potentials, even if not disclosing the sizes. That seems like common sense : you can't expect The Thing to sell in similar fashion than the Nikkatsu Diamond Guys compilations, so you have to adjust according to this.
I'd argue however that when Redman was right about the state of the studios strategies, he explicitly said he expected the format to be at its twilight and to disappear much quicker than it actually does. For all we know now, there might be a sustainable small base for indie labels to keep working within and the physical market might never really die (at least, certainly not right now), which would prove Redman wrong. And even if it does die, it will be quite later than what Redman expected.
I'm quite sure other labels can adapt in similar ways their batch sizes to their releases' expected potentials, even if not disclosing the sizes. That seems like common sense : you can't expect The Thing to sell in similar fashion than the Nikkatsu Diamond Guys compilations, so you have to adjust according to this.
I'd argue however that when Redman was right about the state of the studios strategies, he explicitly said he expected the format to be at its twilight and to disappear much quicker than it actually does. For all we know now, there might be a sustainable small base for indie labels to keep working within and the physical market might never really die (at least, certainly not right now), which would prove Redman wrong. And even if it does die, it will be quite later than what Redman expected.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
yeah he was. He never made a distinction between the survival from the studios to the boutiques. He said flat out that physical media will not be around in 5 to 7 years. If that was the case his marketing would have been different, instead TT had a short term business plan, because to him the end was in sight. I would wager that Becker was not a believer of that idea. He’s even said so much in declaring that physical media is and will always be their main businesscaptveg wrote:He wasn't even that far off, really - nearly all catalog titles are now sold through specialty labels in the US.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Becker also said not a month ago that he doesn't really care about the medium, as long as they're able to make the movies available to the public, hence why they're curating with lots of care their Criterion Channel.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Where did he say that?
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
At a conference he gave at Lyon about 3 weeks ago.
To him, the movie comes first, the format is just a medium to make it accessible. That's why they launched their streaming channel, since it allowed these movies to get in contact with more people (because people are switching to steaming). Criterion don't see themselves so much as a movie label than rather a movie publisher, and they serve, whatever the medium, as intermediate to access the movies. The mission is key and takes over the medium, so it's not so much about the container than the content.
To him, the movie comes first, the format is just a medium to make it accessible. That's why they launched their streaming channel, since it allowed these movies to get in contact with more people (because people are switching to steaming). Criterion don't see themselves so much as a movie label than rather a movie publisher, and they serve, whatever the medium, as intermediate to access the movies. The mission is key and takes over the medium, so it's not so much about the container than the content.
- whaleallright
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:56 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
If it doesn't have DNR, which I trust based on opinions more expert than myself, then *something* is creating the unnaturally waxy sheen on much of the image, including on actors' faces — something very much not present on any of the 35mm prints I've seen, which have plenty of fetching grain and texture. I found the Blu-Ray unwatchable for this reason.nitin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2019 10:59 pmI am fairly sure there is no DNR at play in Leave Her to Heaven, all of the issues (mainly colour) are due to the fact that no 1st or 2nd gen original elements exist. And the DVD is definitely not a better viewing experience IMHO, it fares even worse in the colour department and most definitely has less detail.
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film4/blu-ray_ ... lu-ray.htm
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
This doesn't sound like he doesn't care about the medium.....
The Observer wrote:Is the channel going to change the way you inducted movies into the Criterion Collection when you could only offer a DVD/Blu-ray edition?
For sure. Our flagship line, the Blu-ray, is still the best way to watch a movie. No matter how great the streaming is on Filmstruck and the Criterion Channel, it’s still going to be more compressed than it would be on Blu-ray. Just to get it through the pipe into someone’s home, there’s a lot of magic that happens. It looks great. That said, the definitive, the maximal data, least compression, highest-fidelity image and sound is still the Blu-ray line. The physical object is also still very much a part of our consciousness. On the other hand, the channel frees us to be able to connect our audience with films we might either not have rights to put in physical media or that we want to be able to show in conjunction with another film we do control, as part of a double feature or a “short and feature” combination or as part of a curated series that someone has selected. So there’s going to be titles flowing through the service that we think are going to be rewarding experiences for our audience, but that are not necessarily coming out on disc. There are also going to be titles in our library that are worthy of people’s attention, but might not be able to muscle their way into the Criterion physical media schedule or necessarily survive in the tougher physical media marketplace. It’s allowed us to put our finger on the scale for a lot of different kinds of films that we have always wanted to connect our audience with, but previous marketplace realities had not necessarily been able to support them.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
He doesn't really care, in that he's not particularly attached to the format in a definitive way. That also doesn't mean he's not realistic about the technical differences between streaming and BD, but he made it clear that BD isn't a be-all end-all for Criterion, and that if they need to change and go to steaming, so be it.I think it's an important distinction to make, and one he's actually making in the rest of your quote.
What he explained at Lyon pointed out at Criterion looking BD-releases only as a mean, a vehicle, not a goal in itself. It was DVD before, it's BD now, it'll be something else later. Only the movies remain.
BD sure offers the best quality currently possible for these movies (sustainably speaking for an indie label), but the movie remains more important, and if switching to steaming saves the movie's connection with the public at large, it'll happen, even if it means slightly downgrading the PQ. And I mean : the Channel already exists, with its lower quality, and it seems to me people aren't unhappy with this quality.
It also seems to suffer in parts of technicolor misalignment, which never helps.
What he explained at Lyon pointed out at Criterion looking BD-releases only as a mean, a vehicle, not a goal in itself. It was DVD before, it's BD now, it'll be something else later. Only the movies remain.
BD sure offers the best quality currently possible for these movies (sustainably speaking for an indie label), but the movie remains more important, and if switching to steaming saves the movie's connection with the public at large, it'll happen, even if it means slightly downgrading the PQ. And I mean : the Channel already exists, with its lower quality, and it seems to me people aren't unhappy with this quality.
You can see on caps-a-holic the grain is here, but it indeed isn't as obvious and present than in other restorations. If I had to guess, I'd suppose that they might have used something else than the OCN, possibly an IP, and it explains why grain is here but not so much.whaleallright wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2019 7:08 amIf it doesn't have DNR, which I trust based on opinions more expert than myself, then *something* is creating the unnaturally waxy sheen on much of the image, including on actors' faces — something very much not present on any of the 35mm prints I've seen, which have plenty of fetching grain and texture. I found the Blu-Ray unwatchable for this reason.
It also seems to suffer in parts of technicolor misalignment, which never helps.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
I started my career working exclusively with 35mm, and in an ideal world everyone would be able to watch lab-fresh 35mm projected onto the big screen every single time.
But that's obviously not realistic, and I'm pragmatic enough to acknowledge that Blu-ray is currently the best compromise that we have - but I can also envisage a time when streaming bitrates make the distinction between Blu-ray and streaming much less relevant.
But that's obviously not realistic, and I'm pragmatic enough to acknowledge that Blu-ray is currently the best compromise that we have - but I can also envisage a time when streaming bitrates make the distinction between Blu-ray and streaming much less relevant.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Twilight Time / Redwind
I will take this back to my original point before I went off on a medium tangent. Becker never saw a definitive end of physical media while Redman gave a specific time frame. All I'm saying is they were in different camps, with Becker being in the right camp and understanding the market better
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Yes, they are. Becker is just anticipating the likely needs to adjust how they will, technically speaking, keep on doing what they're doing and keeping the movies central to their activites.
However, I do think that in the end, TT were BD sellers, not movie curators, which probably is the key difference here.
However, I do think that in the end, TT were BD sellers, not movie curators, which probably is the key difference here.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
I think that you are all right, in the sense that probably streaming has become for Criterion what the DVD Eclipse line used to be, especially with the cost benefits of not having to produce even the minimalist largely similarly formatted packaging of the Eclipse line and ship all the sets out to retailers, and the access to a wider range of films that can be changed at a whim or according to calendar events or seasonal programming.
Yet the physical media is still obviously valued, both for providing a physical (and Criterion branded) object and a film in the best possible current quality. Though that does not mean that Blu-ray is the be all and end all, just as DVD was not. Just that there is a delay in the move to UHD for a variety of reasons, presumably from consumer adoption and costs involved in producing discs in the new format (maybe they have different technical issues in producing UHD compared to Blu-ray? I'm not sure as I have not looked into it. Maybe its down to something like the region coding being different, so that would need to get re-negotated all over again? Or just Criterion wanting to get to the milestone of spine number 1000 before taking the next step?), or maybe just being torn internally between another physical format and the current hotness of everyone jumping on the streaming bandwagon. As tenia says I don't think that Becker is really committed to Blu-ray as the format for Criterion, just that there might not be a wish to step backwards in terms of accessibility for audiences that UHD might represent, even if it could provide a jump in quality (but then Blu-ray kind of represented that 'step back' over DVD at the time and they still went for it, so who knows? Though they did wait for the HD-DVD and Blu-ray format war to get settled before they stepped in, from what I recall)
The other thing about streaming that concerns me is that even if the bitrates get upped significantly, the internet might be in use by lots of people in a family or in demand from other services (from streaming television services to videogame downloading) that might throttle the bit rate just as much as any ISP would, as well as the idea that the end consumer does not really 'own' a copy of anything that they purchase any more. Plus of course the idea that we go back to Criterion being restricted back to only being able to provide its streaming service in the US again, much as its streaming partnerships were never accessible elsewhere. Personally if we are going down the online only route I would really like to see Criterion move to something like a full download of a film for a one off fee, which would both solve the problems of providing the end user with a (kind of) 'object' for their purchase (even if it is just a file folder on their hard drive with the film file and supplemental material neatly organised) as well as getting around bitrates causing buffering or streaming issues during playback if something was pre-downloaded to a user's computer (But of course that immediately brings rights licencing issues back to the fore in a way that streaming is presumably intended to easily nullify.
Yet the physical media is still obviously valued, both for providing a physical (and Criterion branded) object and a film in the best possible current quality. Though that does not mean that Blu-ray is the be all and end all, just as DVD was not. Just that there is a delay in the move to UHD for a variety of reasons, presumably from consumer adoption and costs involved in producing discs in the new format (maybe they have different technical issues in producing UHD compared to Blu-ray? I'm not sure as I have not looked into it. Maybe its down to something like the region coding being different, so that would need to get re-negotated all over again? Or just Criterion wanting to get to the milestone of spine number 1000 before taking the next step?), or maybe just being torn internally between another physical format and the current hotness of everyone jumping on the streaming bandwagon. As tenia says I don't think that Becker is really committed to Blu-ray as the format for Criterion, just that there might not be a wish to step backwards in terms of accessibility for audiences that UHD might represent, even if it could provide a jump in quality (but then Blu-ray kind of represented that 'step back' over DVD at the time and they still went for it, so who knows? Though they did wait for the HD-DVD and Blu-ray format war to get settled before they stepped in, from what I recall)
The other thing about streaming that concerns me is that even if the bitrates get upped significantly, the internet might be in use by lots of people in a family or in demand from other services (from streaming television services to videogame downloading) that might throttle the bit rate just as much as any ISP would, as well as the idea that the end consumer does not really 'own' a copy of anything that they purchase any more. Plus of course the idea that we go back to Criterion being restricted back to only being able to provide its streaming service in the US again, much as its streaming partnerships were never accessible elsewhere. Personally if we are going down the online only route I would really like to see Criterion move to something like a full download of a film for a one off fee, which would both solve the problems of providing the end user with a (kind of) 'object' for their purchase (even if it is just a file folder on their hard drive with the film file and supplemental material neatly organised) as well as getting around bitrates causing buffering or streaming issues during playback if something was pre-downloaded to a user's computer (But of course that immediately brings rights licencing issues back to the fore in a way that streaming is presumably intended to easily nullify.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
One of the technical issue they might have with UHD is that it's quite clear now that the main upgrade (and appeal) for UHD is the HDR grade, but that many (most) 4K restorations have been performed in SDR. Releasing SDR UHDs might be considered unworthy of the upgrade by some, thus hurting the sales or possibly further slowing down the launch of the new format for Criterion. This being written, some 4K restoration ARE done in HDR, so they exist, and maybe Criterion could test the waters with those first. It's not as if people expect them releasing 3 UHDs per month straight away !
As for steaming, the issue is not the bitrate at all. The issue is the compromise for providers of paying for higher bitrate instead of simply agressively optimising the video compressiong at lower bitrate. That's why most only offers lossy compressed sound for instance : people don't really realise this anyway, so the platforms can save there. I don't know what sound package the Criterion Channel use, but I highly doubt it's LPCM, or even lossless 48/24 encodes like their BDs. It's even worse in the US since internet neutrality is basically already gone.
The other issue is that while most population are getting lines upgrade on a regular basis, some are still stuck with bandwidth akin to those from 2005, and they're obviously vastly insufficient for any kind of streaming - even SD. The x% stuck with problematic access to high-speed Internet keep on having the problem, while the other 98 (I guess) % are always the same population. This further ostracises the remaining x% by widening the gap between what is available for most of the population and what the others are still stuck with years later.
A simple personal example : in my family, we got our first computer in 1994 and our first Internet subscription around 2000. It was then 56kbps bandwidth. We upgraded to ADSL (think it was 512kbps) around 2003, then ADSL2 around 2005 IIRC (down speed would be about 7 Mbps, or practically speaking, about 1 Mbps). That's what we got until around 2014 when we switched to optic fiber (thanks to a national state-subventioned plan to roll out optic fiber in all of France), but with a limited bandwidth (down speed around 50 Mbps, or practically speaking about 8 Mbps). I moved to Belgium in 2015 and got a slightly better optic fiber bandwtidh (75 Mbps - 15 Mbps in practice) and it's only now, back in France, that I have a whooping 650 Mbps down speed (in practice, about 50 Mbps).
Meanwhile, my GF's father is stuck with a 512kbps subscription since decades, and still can't have access to anything better because his village isn't plugged to anything better. If something even better than what I have happens next year, I might get it, but he won't, only making the gap even bigger for the unlucky few.
As for steaming, the issue is not the bitrate at all. The issue is the compromise for providers of paying for higher bitrate instead of simply agressively optimising the video compressiong at lower bitrate. That's why most only offers lossy compressed sound for instance : people don't really realise this anyway, so the platforms can save there. I don't know what sound package the Criterion Channel use, but I highly doubt it's LPCM, or even lossless 48/24 encodes like their BDs. It's even worse in the US since internet neutrality is basically already gone.
The other issue is that while most population are getting lines upgrade on a regular basis, some are still stuck with bandwidth akin to those from 2005, and they're obviously vastly insufficient for any kind of streaming - even SD. The x% stuck with problematic access to high-speed Internet keep on having the problem, while the other 98 (I guess) % are always the same population. This further ostracises the remaining x% by widening the gap between what is available for most of the population and what the others are still stuck with years later.
A simple personal example : in my family, we got our first computer in 1994 and our first Internet subscription around 2000. It was then 56kbps bandwidth. We upgraded to ADSL (think it was 512kbps) around 2003, then ADSL2 around 2005 IIRC (down speed would be about 7 Mbps, or practically speaking, about 1 Mbps). That's what we got until around 2014 when we switched to optic fiber (thanks to a national state-subventioned plan to roll out optic fiber in all of France), but with a limited bandwidth (down speed around 50 Mbps, or practically speaking about 8 Mbps). I moved to Belgium in 2015 and got a slightly better optic fiber bandwtidh (75 Mbps - 15 Mbps in practice) and it's only now, back in France, that I have a whooping 650 Mbps down speed (in practice, about 50 Mbps).
Meanwhile, my GF's father is stuck with a 512kbps subscription since decades, and still can't have access to anything better because his village isn't plugged to anything better. If something even better than what I have happens next year, I might get it, but he won't, only making the gap even bigger for the unlucky few.
- dwk
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Another Twilight Time sale at SAE:
PRICE BRACKET #1 $8.95:
8 HEADS IN A DUFFEL BAG (1997)
10 RILLINGTON PLACE (1971)
ALEXANDER THE GREAT (1956) - LOW QUANTITY
ALICE (1990)
ANOTHER WOMAN (1988)
APPASSIONATA (1974)
APRIL LOVE (1957)
THE BLACK STALLION RETURNS (1983)
BLACK WIDOW (1987)
BORN FREE (1966) - LOW QUANTITY
BOUND FOR GLORY (1976)
BRUTAL TALES OF CHIVALRY (AKA SHOWA ZANKYO-DEN / REGION A ONLY / 1965)
THE CHILDREN OF HUANG SHI (2008)
COMES A HORSEMAN (1978 / PLEASE SEE TRANSFER NOTE)
COUNT YORGA, VAMPIRE (1970) - LOW QUANTITY
COWBOY (1958) - LOW QUANTITY
THE DETECTIVE (1968) - LOW QUANTITY
THE EFFECT OF GAMMA RAYS ON MAN-IN-THE MOON MARIGOLDS (1972)
THE EMPEROR IN AUGUST (NIHON NO ICHIBAN NAGAI HI KETTEIBAN / 2015 - REGION A ONLY) - LOW QUANTITY
FAT CITY (1972) - LOW QUANTITY
FLAMING STAR (1960) - LOW QUANTITY
FROM NOON TILL THREE (1976)
FROM THE TERRACE (1960)
GRAN BOLLITO (BLACK JOURNAL / 1977)
THE HAPPY ENDING (1969) - LOW QUANTITY
HARRY AND WALTER GO TO NEW YORK (1976)
THE HAWAIIANS (1970) - LOW QUANTITY
IN MY COUNTRY (2004)
IN THE FRENCH STYLE (1963)
JULIA (1977)
KINGS GO FORTH (1958)
LA BAMBOLA DI SATANA (THE DOLL OF SATAN / 1969)
LA MOGLIE PIU BELLA (THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WIFE / 1970)
THE LITTLE HOUSE (CHIISAI OUCHI / 2014)
THE MEMBER OF THE WEDDING (1952)
A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S SEX COMEDY (1982)
MOSCOW ON THE HUDSON (1984)
NICHOLAS NICKLEBY (2002)
A PRAYER FOR THE DYING (1987)
SEPTEMBER (1987)
SHORT NIGHT OF GLASS DOLLS (LA CORTA NOTTE DELLA BAMBOLE DI VETRO / 1971)
STANLEY & IRIS (1990)
THE STONE KILLER (1973)
STRANGE INVADERS (1983)
TO SIR, WITH LOVE (1967) - LOW QUANTITY
THE TWILIGHT SAMURAI (2002) - LOW QUANTITY
THE VALACHI PAPERS (1972) - LOW QUANTITY
THE VIRGIN SOLDIERS (1969)
WUTHERING HEIGHTS (1970)
YEAR OF THE COMET (1992)
PRICE BRACKET #2 $4.95:
ABSOLUTE BEGINNERS (1986)
ANGEL (AKA DANNY BOY / 1982)
THE BEST OF EVERYTHING (1959) - LOW QUANTITY
ALAMO BAY (1985) - LOW QUANTITY
AMERICAN BUFFALO (1996) - LOW QUANTITY
BANDIT QUEEN (1994)
CARLA'S SONG (1996)
CHE! (1969)
THE FANTASTICKS (1995-2000)
FATHERLAND (AKA SINGING THE BLUES IN RED / 1986)
FEVER PITCH (1997)
THE FIRM (2009)
THE FORTUNE (1975) - LOW QUANTITY
THE FRONT (1976) - LOW QUANTITY
A MONTH IN THE COUNTRY (1987)
RESURRECTED (1989)
RIFF-RAFF (1991) / RAINING STONES (1993)
RITA, SUE AND BOB TOO (1987)
SAVE YOUR LEGS! (2012)
SCORPIO (1973) - LOW QUANTITY
PRICE BRACKET #3 $2.50:
VIOLENT SATURDAY (DVD / 1955)
WOMAN OBSESSED (1959) (DVD)
PRICE BRACKET #1 $8.95:
8 HEADS IN A DUFFEL BAG (1997)
10 RILLINGTON PLACE (1971)
ALEXANDER THE GREAT (1956) - LOW QUANTITY
ALICE (1990)
ANOTHER WOMAN (1988)
APPASSIONATA (1974)
APRIL LOVE (1957)
THE BLACK STALLION RETURNS (1983)
BLACK WIDOW (1987)
BORN FREE (1966) - LOW QUANTITY
BOUND FOR GLORY (1976)
BRUTAL TALES OF CHIVALRY (AKA SHOWA ZANKYO-DEN / REGION A ONLY / 1965)
THE CHILDREN OF HUANG SHI (2008)
COMES A HORSEMAN (1978 / PLEASE SEE TRANSFER NOTE)
COUNT YORGA, VAMPIRE (1970) - LOW QUANTITY
COWBOY (1958) - LOW QUANTITY
THE DETECTIVE (1968) - LOW QUANTITY
THE EFFECT OF GAMMA RAYS ON MAN-IN-THE MOON MARIGOLDS (1972)
THE EMPEROR IN AUGUST (NIHON NO ICHIBAN NAGAI HI KETTEIBAN / 2015 - REGION A ONLY) - LOW QUANTITY
FAT CITY (1972) - LOW QUANTITY
FLAMING STAR (1960) - LOW QUANTITY
FROM NOON TILL THREE (1976)
FROM THE TERRACE (1960)
GRAN BOLLITO (BLACK JOURNAL / 1977)
THE HAPPY ENDING (1969) - LOW QUANTITY
HARRY AND WALTER GO TO NEW YORK (1976)
THE HAWAIIANS (1970) - LOW QUANTITY
IN MY COUNTRY (2004)
IN THE FRENCH STYLE (1963)
JULIA (1977)
KINGS GO FORTH (1958)
LA BAMBOLA DI SATANA (THE DOLL OF SATAN / 1969)
LA MOGLIE PIU BELLA (THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WIFE / 1970)
THE LITTLE HOUSE (CHIISAI OUCHI / 2014)
THE MEMBER OF THE WEDDING (1952)
A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S SEX COMEDY (1982)
MOSCOW ON THE HUDSON (1984)
NICHOLAS NICKLEBY (2002)
A PRAYER FOR THE DYING (1987)
SEPTEMBER (1987)
SHORT NIGHT OF GLASS DOLLS (LA CORTA NOTTE DELLA BAMBOLE DI VETRO / 1971)
STANLEY & IRIS (1990)
THE STONE KILLER (1973)
STRANGE INVADERS (1983)
TO SIR, WITH LOVE (1967) - LOW QUANTITY
THE TWILIGHT SAMURAI (2002) - LOW QUANTITY
THE VALACHI PAPERS (1972) - LOW QUANTITY
THE VIRGIN SOLDIERS (1969)
WUTHERING HEIGHTS (1970)
YEAR OF THE COMET (1992)
PRICE BRACKET #2 $4.95:
ABSOLUTE BEGINNERS (1986)
ANGEL (AKA DANNY BOY / 1982)
THE BEST OF EVERYTHING (1959) - LOW QUANTITY
ALAMO BAY (1985) - LOW QUANTITY
AMERICAN BUFFALO (1996) - LOW QUANTITY
BANDIT QUEEN (1994)
CARLA'S SONG (1996)
CHE! (1969)
THE FANTASTICKS (1995-2000)
FATHERLAND (AKA SINGING THE BLUES IN RED / 1986)
FEVER PITCH (1997)
THE FIRM (2009)
THE FORTUNE (1975) - LOW QUANTITY
THE FRONT (1976) - LOW QUANTITY
A MONTH IN THE COUNTRY (1987)
RESURRECTED (1989)
RIFF-RAFF (1991) / RAINING STONES (1993)
RITA, SUE AND BOB TOO (1987)
SAVE YOUR LEGS! (2012)
SCORPIO (1973) - LOW QUANTITY
PRICE BRACKET #3 $2.50:
VIOLENT SATURDAY (DVD / 1955)
WOMAN OBSESSED (1959) (DVD)
- Feego
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:30 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
TT's Best of Everything Blu is very, well, blue. As someone who has never seen the film before, is it worth snagging this for $4.95, or should I go for the older, less teal DVD?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
It’s an amazing movie and all Fox titles end up looking like that on Blu, so you’re not gonna get a competing version in the future, especially with Disney’s stranglehold
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
domino's motto for 2020: "Give up and give in"
-
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 1:27 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Any other recommendations from that list?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
American Buffalo if you don’t already have it, though I feel it’s been on sale for years
- senseabove
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:07 am
Re: Twilight Time / Redwind
Fat City, if only for Susan Tyrell, if you haven't picked up the Indicator.
The Happy Ending and Member of the Wedding are two of my favorite blind-buys ever, with excellent lead performances from Jean Simmons and Julie Harris.
The Happy Ending and Member of the Wedding are two of my favorite blind-buys ever, with excellent lead performances from Jean Simmons and Julie Harris.