Jeffrey Wells Mod • 21 hours ago wrote: Wells to ihaveasaershooder: It's not dripping with anything. It's just a mild-mannered observation. One of the tenets of the new politically correct fascism is that there's absolutely no such thing as an unattractive or homely person with oddly assembled or heavyish male-ish features. Well, that may satisfy the tenets of the new fascism, but ii doesn't happen to be accurate.
Jeffrey Wells • 2 days ago wrote: What's your problem? I phrased it cautiously, respectfully. I don't live in those tight little wooden box crates that you think people should live in. I'm free to do what I want any old time. Within the bounds of reason and civility.
The best / worst thing about Wells is that not only he casually writes things like that, but he also thinks he HAS TO answer about people calling him on this. He's like the guy who doesn't know when to speak but also when to just shut up.
If this is just a mild-mannered cautiously and respectfully phrased observation, I can't even imagine what he reads like when he's going wilder.
Also, I believe that this explains just sooooooo much and I almost feel sad for him but actually no :
Jeffrey Wells • 21 hours ago wrote: Chelsea -- I've been doing nothing but struggle to attend to women's needs almost all my adult life. I was selfish in my 20s but I got with the program after I hit 30 or thereabouts. Relationships work only when you decide it's totally about her and not in the least about yourself, and even then you might get deep-sixed. I'm not squirming. I'm just honestly saying that IF I were a bi girl I would want to sleep with hot-looking honeys...that's all. What's so horrific about that?