W. (Oliver Stone, 2008)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#176 Post by Fletch F. Fletch » Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:27 pm

Stone's film will be opening the Austin Film Festival.

An interview with Stone.

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#177 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:20 pm

Fascinating interview, Fletch. Sad to read about how Pinkville was done in by the studio.

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

#178 Post by Jeff » Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:52 pm

New TV spot is pretty hilarious.

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#179 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:03 pm

Best use of that song, ever.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

#180 Post by Murdoch » Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:40 pm

I like how George Sr. is Poppy Bush.

User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:40 pm

#181 Post by Highway 61 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:10 pm

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Best use of that song, ever.
Indeed. Brilliant. Even if this is shit, I'm getting more and more excited to see it.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#182 Post by domino harvey » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:18 pm

PG-13? Is that a first for Stone?

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#183 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:20 pm

Actually, a 2nd. World Trade Center is as well. Wait...this is PG-13? I know it said so in the Huffington trailer, but I can't quite believe that.

User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:40 pm

#184 Post by Highway 61 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:31 pm

...and just like that, I'm less excited. :oops:

Grand Illusion
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:56 am

#185 Post by Grand Illusion » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:46 pm

Drug use alone should've pushed this to a hard R.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#186 Post by domino harvey » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:49 pm

People under 17 can't vote, why would they be courting kids?

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:18 pm

#187 Post by tavernier » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:22 am

I'm sure Ollie will say shit like he wants to teach the kids something about history. :shock:

User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#188 Post by Fletch F. Fletch » Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:08 am

I'm definitely getting more of the satire vibe that Stone was speaking of in that interview with this new TV spot. Looks promising!

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#189 Post by Antoine Doinel » Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:35 pm

Here's the new trailer inexplicably cued to the Talking Heads. Seems more like a farce than a satire.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#190 Post by domino harvey » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:46 pm

Isn't that was linked a few posts up?

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#191 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:55 pm

Nope, it's basically an extended version of that TV spot.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#192 Post by Tom Hagen » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:54 pm

Did anyone else notice that the new trailer uses all of Maureen Dowd's cutesy nicknames for the Bushies? It's amazing that her writing has reached that level of cultural saturation, and it's ironic that her nicknames are being used to sell this farce in light of the epic, hilarious takedown of Stone's Nixon that she wrote 13 years ago.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#193 Post by domino harvey » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:58 pm

Tom Hagen wrote: the epic, hilarious takedown of Stone's Nixon that she wrote 13 years ago.
Bob Woodward observed, "I guess everybody gets the psychoanalyst they deserve, and Nixon got Oliver Stone."
Brilliant

User avatar
LQ
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:51 am
Contact:

#194 Post by LQ » Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:36 pm


User avatar
Cronenfly
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:04 pm

#195 Post by Cronenfly » Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:27 pm

Bale as Bush? I hope those screen tests make it onto the DVD...

User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#196 Post by Fletch F. Fletch » Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:19 pm

The Guardian interviews Stone.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#197 Post by Antoine Doinel » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:18 am

Todd McCarthy of Variety posts his review and it's not good.
Stone and Weiser make no attempt to cover historical bases; Major episodes, including political campaigns, business alliances and elections, are completely omitted. Most scenes are devoted to illuminating particular aspects of George W. examined in pithy interludes are his recklessness, people skills, insecurities, reliance upon Laura, impatience, belief that good will prevail and unwillingness to deviate once he's made up his mind. Stone stands back as if to strenuously avoid the appearance of judging his subject even as he pigeonholes him psychologically.
Docu-like feel of the latter stretch is emphasized by the sudden use of extensive real footage of Iraq, the "Mission Accomplished" aircraft carrier stunt and a Bush speech before the joint Houses of Congress, with the actors blended in with actual politicos. Pic thus enters TV territory, to its detriment, and Stone has no choice but to end on an ambiguously fanciful note that can mean anything you want it to mean.

User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#198 Post by kaujot » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:10 am

Antoine Doinel wrote:Todd McCarthy of Variety posts his review and it's not good.
Is there such a thing of as a good review in Variety? I don't read them unless it's in a link from here, really, and I can't recall ever being sent to a positive review.

User avatar
foliagecop
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:42 am
Location: Scotland

#199 Post by foliagecop » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:56 am

To be honest, that review isn't too bad. McCarthy certainly doesn't come across as a Stone-basher, which is refreshing, and he does concede a handful of positive points. So I suppose it could have been worse.

Still, there does seem a distinct lack of trademark Stone-isms in the film, both thematically and aesthetically. A trade-off for Middle American bums-on-seats perhaps? Personally, I can't see it. Not from Ollie the perennial maverick.

Whatever the reason, and however positive/negative the reviews, I'll watch the film and judge it for myself.

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

#200 Post by aox » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:29 pm

foliagecop wrote:Whatever the reason, and however positive/negative the reviews, I'll watch the film and judge it for myself.
I have found with any Stone film that is political in nature, this is the only sensible course of action.

Post Reply