Criterion and Warner Bros.

News on Criterion and Janus Films.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#876 Post by ryannichols7 » Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:33 pm

PTA is also supposedly against UHD, I feel like I saw that somewhere. hence why Licorice Pizza only got a BD despite being shot on 70mm (how Phantom Thread happened, I'm not sure). I don't expect any of his films on the format for awhile until proven otherwise

EWS is still a likely Criterion, I feel if WB was gonna do that one they would've by now

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#877 Post by therewillbeblus » Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:45 pm

The only 'news' I've read of PTA being against UHD is from speculative reddit threads based on either a) their absence, or b) other speculative YT videos relaying the same speculation. Has he ever personally spoken about the format?

User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#878 Post by ryannichols7 » Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:08 pm

therewillbeblus wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:45 pm
The only 'news' I've read of PTA being against UHD is from speculative reddit threads based on either a) their absence, or b) other speculative YT videos relaying the same speculation. Has he ever personally spoken about the format?
no, so definitely speculation. it does seem to be case though, as I imagine Licorice Pizza would've certainly seen a UHD release otherwise (it even had a poster included, so it wasn't exactly a tossed off studio effort). hopefully someone is able to ask him about it soon. I know Barry Sonnenfeld is someone who's spoken against it publicly

User avatar
dekadetia
was Born Innocent
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#879 Post by dekadetia » Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:26 pm

ryannichols7 wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:33 pm
PTA is also supposedly against UHD, I feel like I saw that somewhere. hence why Licorice Pizza only got a BD despite being shot on 70mm (how Phantom Thread happened, I'm not sure). I don't expect any of his films on the format for awhile until proven otherwise

EWS is still a likely Criterion, I feel if WB was gonna do that one they would've by now
Licorice Pizza was shot on 35, not 70, but does have a UHD streaming file with HDR grading, it just doesn't have a disc release at this point.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#880 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:48 pm

yoloswegmaster wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 1:34 pm
I wonder if the the absence of Eyes Wide Shut, Boogie Nights, and The Wild Bunch on the mega 4K boxset from WB is because it's been licensed to Criterion. This is speculation or course, but I can't think of any reason for either of these titles to be excluded from the boxset.
Well, they can't fit everything into these box sets. There are so many other titles you can wonder about. The Adventures of Robin Hood, Mutiny on the Bounty, The Treasure of Sierra Madre and Network are several great examples of Warner Brothers' history that could've been included. I don't think the absence of titles means anything in regards to a Criterion release. It has more to do with what the WB execs in charge feels best represents their legacy.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#881 Post by swo17 » Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:54 pm

Tom Hanks in Elvis

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#882 Post by yoloswegmaster » Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:04 pm

therewillbeblus wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:45 pm
The only 'news' I've read of PTA being against UHD is from speculative reddit threads based on either a) their absence, or b) other speculative YT videos relaying the same speculation. Has he ever personally spoken about the format?
It's definitely based on speculation and a baseless and useless one at that since PTA himself said that he was involved with the HDR grading on the 4K UHD of Phantom Thread. If he is so against UHD, then why bother being involved in the release of it. Licorice Pizza doesn't have a UHD despite it being available in 4K HDR on iTunes but that doesn't really mean much since there are other MGM titles such as House of Gucci, Till, and Bones and All that haven't been released on the format, so I presume it's something on the distributors end that is blocking the 4K releases.

General rule of thumb is to ignore any sort of speculation on reddit since users on there tend to be full of shit. I recall this one guy who was complaining about Floating Weeds not getting a blu upgrade but when presented with a theory that Criterion could be waiting for the original film to get a restoration so that they can upgrade the double-pack together, they arrogantly claimed that no pre-1949 Ozu film would be getting a 4K restoration. They were confirmed to be full of shit when it was revealed that Ozu's 1948 film 'A Hen in the Wind' had been restored in 4K just a few months prior to the post. Hell, I remember this one guy straight-up claim that Criterion and Janus have no relation with one another (and was being upvoted at that!), which confirmed to me that the Criterion subreddit is just straight useless.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#883 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:11 pm

swo17 wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:54 pm
Tom Hanks in Elvis
I guess the interns got a say

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#884 Post by yoloswegmaster » Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:28 pm

What A Disgrace wrote:
Tue Feb 07, 2023 2:03 pm
Citizen Kane was also licensed to Criterion, and it's in the box. The reason they aren't in the box likely has more to do with the fact that the box set is a haphazardly hobbled together collection of movies.
I actually just realized that the boxset has only been found on the U.K. sites of the WB shop and Amazon, which would explain why Citizen Kane is included in the set. Maybe the U.S. version will omit CK and include something else instead? They could also be releasing the films that I mentioned as 4K standalones or including them in that 100 film Blu set that they are planning on releasing. Regardless, we've probably put more thought into the set itself than the WB executives have.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#885 Post by Matt » Thu Mar 16, 2023 12:21 am

For those who don’t follow the Turner Classic Movies thread:

At the TCM Film Festival, Steven Spielberg and Paul Thomas Anderson will be announcing a ten-year partnership between Warner Bros. Discovery and the Film Foundation for film restorations. I wouldn’t be surprised to see some of the resulting restorations to be released by Criterion.

Crimlaw25
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:08 am

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#886 Post by Crimlaw25 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:56 am

For starters. Welles’ Journey in Fear would be nice.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#887 Post by FrauBlucher » Thu Mar 16, 2023 7:52 am

Crimlaw25 wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:56 am
For starters. Welles’ Journey in Fear would be nice.
As a Welles connected source told me Criterion acquired the rights of Journey into Fear at the same time they acquired Kane and Ambersons.

User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#888 Post by ryannichols7 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 12:04 pm

Matt wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2023 12:21 am
For those who don’t follow the Turner Classic Movies thread:

At the TCM Film Festival, Steven Spielberg and Paul Thomas Anderson will be announcing a ten-year partnership between Warner Bros. Discovery and the Film Foundation for film restorations. I wouldn’t be surprised to see some of the resulting restorations to be released by Criterion.
I wonder if this is where The Crowd, The Wind, and Greed get restored, among others

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#889 Post by beamish14 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:24 pm

FrauBlucher wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2023 7:52 am
Crimlaw25 wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:56 am
For starters. Welles’ Journey in Fear would be nice.
As a Welles connected source told me Criterion acquired the rights of Journey into Fear at the same time they acquired Kane and Ambersons.


I have no doubt that they’ve been sitting on it for ages. WB has both cuts of it

User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#890 Post by ryannichols7 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:31 pm

George Feltenstein confirmed The Roaring Twenties would be coming to bluray. I'm putting this here since we've kinda known Criterion has been sitting on it for some time, and because the way George said it on the podcast (at least to me) sounded annoyed that it's being sat on. which it surely has

someone find a way to ask him about The Lusty Men also!

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#891 Post by yoloswegmaster » Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:16 pm

Here's a blast from the past. This is a list of directors who had phantom pages appear on the old site appear at the same time back in 2016:

Edward Sedgwick - The Cameraman
Tod Browning - ?
Harmony Korine - ?
John Cameron Mitchell - Hedwig and the Angry Inch
Raoul Walsh - High Sierra
Mervyn Leroy - ?
Irving Rapper - Now, Voyager
George Sidney - ?
James Whale - Show Boat
George Stevens - Woman of the Year, Swing Time

Most of the directors listed have had titles already released and it's obvious that these were a part of the WB deal since the titles listed are all licensed from WB, so the missing titles should be from them as well. I'm presuming that the missing titles are for Freaks, Gummo (or julien donkey-boy, since Criterion did say that it would be possible for them to release a Dogme title), Scaramouche, and either Little Caesar or I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang.

MongooseCmr
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:50 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#892 Post by MongooseCmr » Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:23 pm

You have to wonder if Criterion’s recent financial troubles is in part due to possibly sitting on licenses for almost 8 years

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#893 Post by beamish14 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:48 pm

I have no doubt that Gummo would be a huge seller. I can’t believe how much of a cult following that film has developed

User avatar
jwo17
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:02 am

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#894 Post by jwo17 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:41 pm

beamish14 wrote:
Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:48 pm
I have no doubt that Gummo would be a huge seller. I can’t believe how much of a cult following that film has developed
Wholeheartedly agree and not just because I would pay A LOT of money to upgrade that 20+-year-old DVD. In the meantime, at least we have the brief scene from it on the recently released Belly UHD disc to keep us wishing [-o<

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#895 Post by colinr0380 » Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:26 pm

Gummo of course inspired the only notable moment of the whole of The X Factor, which may have been the most publicity it ever received!

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#896 Post by FrauBlucher » Mon Oct 16, 2023 6:02 pm

Once again back to the list fetish. The original list of WB titles that went OOP and then entered the Criterion Collection...
4 to go
IN
Lone Star
Round Midnight
The Philadelphia Story
Hedwig & The Angry Inch
Bringing Up Baby
Arsenic and Old Lace
Mean Streets
Barry Lyndon


NOT YET
The Roaring Twenties
Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid
O Lucky Man
Captain Blood

User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#897 Post by captveg » Tue Oct 17, 2023 2:33 pm

Of the released titles that were BD only I gotta think Barry Lyndon is the only one with high chances of getting a 4K UHD upgrade.

User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#898 Post by ryannichols7 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:16 pm

I don't agree with that - Badlands is very likely and I'm sure enough people would buy the Before Trilogy again too, among others. Dreams and Mildred Pierce aren't exactly the biggest names and they still got the bump. the question with Badlands is where Malick's priorities are on getting his films in 4K - he rightfully went for Days of Heaven first, my bias aside, it was the only one that didn't have a 4K restoration on Bluray, only carrying a 2008 DVD era master. I'll be curious to see what comes next

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#899 Post by yoloswegmaster » Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:28 pm

captveg wrote:
Tue Oct 17, 2023 2:33 pm
Of the released titles that were BD only I gotta think Barry Lyndon is the only one with high chances of getting a 4K UHD upgrade.
I could also see Hedwig & The Angry Inch getting an upgrade down the line. I think it's a title that has sold well, and it feels like it was made for the format, as the HDR will really bring the visuals of the film out.

User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Criterion and Warner Bros.

#900 Post by captveg » Wed Oct 18, 2023 11:42 am

ryannichols7 wrote:
Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:16 pm
I don't agree with that - Badlands is very likely and I'm sure enough people would buy the Before Trilogy again too, among others.
To clarify, I meant from that list that Frau had just posted.

Post Reply