Oh, That Viridiana Cover!

News on Criterion and Janus Films.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#126 Post by Cinephrenic » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:21 pm

but given Pinal's contributions to this and other of Bunuel's Mexican/Spanish films
Another confirmation of Exterminating Angel and Simon of the Desert.

User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#127 Post by godardslave » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:52 pm

cinephrenic wrote:
but given Pinal's contributions to this and other of Bunuel's Mexican/Spanish films
Another confirmation of Exterminating Angel and Simon of the Desert.
Viridiana and these 2 films should so be a boxset (digipak). but it wont happen. :/

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

#128 Post by zedz » Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:34 pm

Lovely news. Let's put Silvia on a second disc with Simon of the Desert, shall we? Great as she is in Viridiana, I'll always think of her in Jesus drag dropkicking that lamb.

The couple of months' delay could hardly have been attributed to the creation of new cover art, anyway, since it only took them 5 minutes to come up with the first version.

User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#129 Post by hammock » Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:46 am

I don't think, or hope, that the kind people at CC let us dictate their covers and that they will stick to the one already posted.
My friends would hospitalize me immediately if they were aware that I have been discussing the colour pink in a forum.
Would be fun if Matt changed the forum colours to shades of that specific pink for a day as an homage to Viridiana, the most talked about CC cover that had to have it's own thread...

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#130 Post by Michael Kerpan » Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:19 am

hammock wrote:I don't think, or hope, that the kind people at CC let us dictate their covers and that they will stick to the one already posted.
I would hope that Criterion WOULD listen to people who buy their products by the fistful -- and who are (over-)invested in the success of each new release (and the health of a company that they don't even own).

The proposed Viridiana cover is simply embarrassingly bad. Friends don't let friends drive drunk .... or design covers for important releases while in a similar condition.

User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#131 Post by hammock » Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:30 am

And how many people exactly should not like a cover for CC to change it? 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6? If CC like the cover (I can only assume that since they uploaded it) that it is all that matters and they should stick with it! Don't forget that some people actually like the cover...

Mathieu
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:19 pm

#132 Post by Mathieu » Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:18 pm

Don't forget that some people actually like the cover...
Some people actually like Robocop 3 and Alice Sebold novels.

kekid
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm

#133 Post by kekid » Thu Dec 22, 2005 2:49 pm

I think most well-run organizations have a way to capture consumer opinion. They reserve the right to determine how to respond to that opinion. Criterion issues 3 to 4 DVDs a month, and rarely does a separate track get created on a specific cover design by members of this forum, who are clearly their passionate consumers (I am not sure how representative we are of their total consumer base). Therefore in my opinion it would be not wise for them to ignore the feedback. They may choose, after due consideration, that the cover is fine as it stands. That is their prerogative. If they stay with it, we will never know how much of an impact that decision had on their sales, because answering that type of question would require a controlled test, which Criterion is too small an organization to undertake. If I was on the management team of Criterion I would consider changing the cover because the cost of modification at this stage of development is probably small compared to the potential negative impact it might have.

User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#134 Post by hammock » Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:22 pm

You got a point and maybe I will soften up on my stiff opinion with time, but I have never been a crowd pleaser and if CC loves the artwork I think the right thing would be for them to keep it as is. If it was just a modification of the cover people requested I would be more willing to accept I guess. Maybe not, I don't know, I'm confused!!!

User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:10 am
Location: Atlanta

#135 Post by Ashirg » Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:26 pm


Cinéslob
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:31 pm

#136 Post by Cinéslob » Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:29 pm

A drastic improvement indeed!

User avatar
bunuelian
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:49 am
Location: San Diego

#137 Post by bunuelian » Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:03 pm

PEOPLE POWER! Much nicer.

User avatar
daniel p
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

#138 Post by daniel p » Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:17 pm

Image

User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#139 Post by godardslave » Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:11 pm

they listened to the people!
much better. black and white all the way.
Last edited by godardslave on Sun Feb 19, 2006 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

#140 Post by peerpee » Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:37 pm

Knockout!

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#141 Post by domino harvey » Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:40 pm

I prefer the pink one. they should print the original on the other side of the label. it's a shame that all the people bitching on this forum made Criterion second guess themselves.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#142 Post by Michael Kerpan » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:30 pm

Nice to see that Criterion re-thought the Viridiana cover -- and came up with a really good one.

Now -- if only they will similarly re-assess how they balance the color on Ozu films ....

User avatar
Schkura
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: Mississippi

#143 Post by Schkura » Sun Feb 19, 2006 2:47 am

domino harvey wrote:I prefer the pink one. they should print the original on the other side of the label. it's a shame that all the people bitching on this forum made Criterion second guess themselves.
Meanwhile (in the Hall of Justice), I admire the fact that a company of Criterion's ilk was willing to second-guess themselves. I doubt any other recipient of my recreation budget gives a shit what I think about an unreleased product's packaging-- particularly if its merely an annoyance and will likely not affect my decision to purchase it. Power to the people indeed.

Anyone think the recent lack of official announcements for upcoming titles is related to the Viridiana controversy? I, for one, promise not to trash-talk any projected cover of CC's Double Indemnity if they'd be cool enough to announce it. :wink:

Arcadean
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 5:33 am

#144 Post by Arcadean » Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:54 am

I was going to buy the film anyway, but with this new cover, I won't have to wrap up the DVD in newspaper to avoid losing my eyesight. Fantastic cover. I dare anyone to fucking complain now... :wink:

User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#145 Post by hammock » Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:26 am

The new cover looks excellent but I'm sure Mr. Bunuel would have prefered the first one and not a "doll" black and white cover.

rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:24 pm

#146 Post by rwaits » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:42 pm

Beautiful. I really thought they were going to pull its release for three months, and come back with that same nasty cover. I'm very pleased with this one.

User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#147 Post by justeleblanc » Sun Feb 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Viridiana looks amazing!! I wonder how it would look if the CRITERION COLLECTION and the line underneath were to also be in that same awesome thick which font.

bufordsharkley
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:08 am

#148 Post by bufordsharkley » Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:40 pm

I frankly preferred the choice of photograph, and overall composition, from the previous cover. But what a font-- brilliant. I guess I'm a fan of the change, if only because of the font.

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

#149 Post by ianungstad » Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:45 pm

Much improved! Thanks criterion!

User avatar
bunuelian
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:49 am
Location: San Diego

#150 Post by bunuelian » Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:03 pm

hammock wrote:The new cover looks excellent but I'm sure Mr. Bunuel would have prefered the first one and not a "doll" black and white cover.
I think he hated most everything other people did to sell his stuff, so it's probably moot to bring it up. But because this "doll" is one of the most scandalous images Bunuel ever made (an initiate nun drugged and about to be raped by her uncle? Franco's hair gets grayer even in his grave every time the film is shown), I sincerely doubt Bunuel would feel too badly toward the new cover. That Warhol-esque monstrosity, on the other hand . . .

Post Reply