Shadows I would say is rough, even rougher than the other films in the set. True its difficult to get through but face it no one really makes films like Cassavetes, so it is a shock. Even mores when it is the roughest and less narrative driven unlike the films that followed with Woman Under the Influence being what I think to be one of the more structured films in the set, but at the same time its precisely that "rawness" or lack of structure that I find charming about it, I call it raw as I find my experiene with Cassavetes to be like sushi you may be shocked or repulsed at first but eventually its a taste you become accustomed to with each film. That like Jazz each scene slowly "improvises" but it has a certain sincerity to it, though it may not be the most coherent or precise but with that sincerity its bound to hit you hard:aox wrote:Damn, I could barely get through Shadows. I thought it was excruciatingly tedious. I loved the jazz, and I liked how Cassavetes worked his camera and actors like an ensemble, but I just couldn't get into it. Nonetheless, cheers to Criterion; the film is obviously in terrible shape and we are lucky we have it at all at this point.
Edit: Course Faces has its own charms too, as many have discussed especially with the way the characters act, and the openning is one of my favorites. Surprised that you opted to skip over it O.o
As for the condition of the print, which shows the lack technical prowess and neatness of the way the film was shot, only further the experience of Shadows.