Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#276 Post by hearthesilence » Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:20 pm

I just checked that review. Honestly, his comments on the "softness" sound like he's seeing what I saw.

phoenix474
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:17 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#277 Post by phoenix474 » Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:18 pm

Svet also took a look at Dreams (sorry, too late to figure out a pun)

Edit. Svetdust and Tinsel too! (that was easy)

Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:29 am

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#278 Post by Orlac » Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:12 am

tenia wrote:
Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:05 am
It doesn't look bad per se, but it just is a now-obsolete restoration made from a 35mm fine-grain master positive on a Spirit DataCine. These aren't aging well.
It's the contrast that looks off, like the whites and blacks have been artificially boosted.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#279 Post by tenia » Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:15 am

Ah, I see. I thought you were talking rather about the texture.
Criterion was known to boost their contrast in the DVD era and I wouldnt be surprised if they also did that on some of their BD releases.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#280 Post by MichaelB » Wed Oct 24, 2018 12:40 pm

tenia wrote:Ah, I see. I thought you were talking rather about the texture.
Criterion was known to boost their contrast in the DVD era and I wouldnt be surprised if they also did that on some of their BD releases.
There’s a pervasive assumption that “black and white” means “deep rich blacks to dazzlingly pure whites”, but this may of course not have been what was originally intended.

I’ve given this example elsewhere, but when Institute Benjamenta was restored it was initially given a typically high-contrast grade, and most likely looked terrific to the untutored eye - but it definitely wasn’t what the director or their cinematographer were after, which was mostly greys and only very very occasional pure blacks and whites. Fortunately, they were (and, happily, still are) around to stamp their authority on the restoration, but how many other instances have there been of well-meaning technicians giving a grade that’s higher-contrast than the filmmakers intended? I suspect the answer may well be “quite a few”.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#281 Post by domino harvey » Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:02 pm

No DVDBeaver review yet, but a user on the Blu-ray.com forum sez they talked to the resto company and Fanny and Alexander will be "partially" restored for some scenes, which as I understand it means the color timing may shift throughout the film-- that's got to be more annoying than a consistent approach for either temperature, right?

User avatar
HitchcockLang
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#282 Post by HitchcockLang » Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:13 pm

domino harvey wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:02 pm
No DVDBeaver review yet, but a user on the Blu-ray.com forum sez they talked to the resto company and Fanny and Alexander will be "partially" restored for some scenes, which as I understand it means the color timing may shift throughout the film-- that's got to be more annoying than a consistent approach for either temperature, right?
Is it possible that in such a situation, someone overseeing color grading would be considering this and comparing it all in context for reference?

I'm not very sensitive to color. I remember thinking the new 4K of Playtime looked far too green to me from side-by-side caps but by itself in motion, I thought it looked great. Therefore, I agree with you that constantly comparing two different color grades as they switch back and forth would be much more alarming to even those of us who are less sensitive.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#283 Post by hearthesilence » Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:26 pm

MichaelB wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 12:40 pm
There’s a pervasive assumption that “black and white” means “deep rich blacks to dazzlingly pure whites”...
I've been listening to Michael Jackson records this past week, and when I read that, I immediately picture MJ in his deep black fedora, jacket and shoes along with his dazzling white socks, shirt and of course sparkling glove.

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#284 Post by Roger Ryan » Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:45 am

domino harvey wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:02 pm
No DVDBeaver review yet, but a user on the Blu-ray.com forum sez they talked to the resto company and Fanny and Alexander will be "partially" restored for some scenes, which as I understand it means the color timing may shift throughout the film-- that's got to be more annoying than a consistent approach for either temperature, right?
Well, the good news here is that even a partial new scan means a completely new encode, which will hopefully fix the compression issues of the earlier release.


User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#286 Post by domino harvey » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:56 am

After the Rehearsal is very tinty, yet again. The 1.66 is the same as the Taran DVD, so I've never seen it any other way.

I don't have the Tartan DVD any more, but here's a not exact frame comparison to show the color difference

Image

Image

This is a grungy-looking movie, though, so I'm not sure it matters as much here as it does for Cries and Whispers or the Passion of Anna

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#287 Post by tenia » Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:06 am

It almost reminds me of the blue-ish tint Eclair tends to give to some of their restorations. It doesn't look exactly the same than here, though, but there is a kind of redundancy in the way flesh tones vs colder elements are graded here, the 4th capture at Beaver especially.

User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:44 am

Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#288 Post by movielocke » Thu Oct 25, 2018 1:28 pm

domino harvey wrote:After the Rehearsal is very tinty, yet again. The 1.66 is the same as the Taran DVD, so I've never seen it any other way.

I don't have the Tartan DVD any more, but here's a not exact frame comparison to show the color difference

Image

Image

This is a grungy-looking movie, though, so I'm not sure it matters as much here as it does for Cries and Whispers or the Passion of Anna
The top one has a digital wash from using an auto white balance tool on the “gray” floor and they goosed the highlights. Look at the color separation of the rug in the two images, the color has been washed out by the digital manipulation in the top image but has tonal quality consistent with the lighting of the scene in the second image.

mteller
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:23 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#289 Post by mteller » Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:27 pm

All These Women

I don't know if I can make myself watch this for a third time. It's so awful. Very pretty, but awful.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#290 Post by domino harvey » Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:35 pm

Yep. To anyone who hasn't seen it: no matter how bad you think it will be, it's actually worse

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#291 Post by knives » Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:49 pm

To further make myself the guy with bad opinions I like it and take the aesthetic fun as the soul of the ride.

User avatar
jsteffe
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#292 Post by jsteffe » Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:18 pm

domino harvey wrote:
Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:56 am
After the Rehearsal is very tinty, yet again. The 1.66 is the same as the Taran DVD, so I've never seen it any other way.

I don't have the Tartan DVD any more, but here's a not exact frame comparison to show the color difference

Image

Image

This is a grungy-looking movie, though, so I'm not sure it matters as much here as it does for Cries and Whispers or the Passion of Anna
It's like 2-color Technicolor - all salmon and blue-green. I've never seen the film in 35mm, only on video, so I can't comment on what it has looked like in the past.
Last edited by jsteffe on Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

phoenix474
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:17 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#293 Post by phoenix474 » Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:08 pm

Fårö dokument @ Beaver, super excited to see this

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#294 Post by domino harvey » Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:24 pm

I will say that Criterion has removed the only reason to watch All These Women-- to enjoy Bergman's lush and vivid use of color that resembles the palette found in MGM musicals-- with this restoration, so good work

EDIT: You know what, I'm going to walk this back, because doing a comparison shows this resto actually seems to have gotten it right! Mea culpa. Again, not an exact frame match, but Tartan DVD vs Criterion

Image

Image

Okay, so that's 1-4 on the color restos so far, I think

ari101
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 5:49 am

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#295 Post by ari101 » Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:41 pm

domino harvey wrote:
Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:35 pm
Yep. To anyone who hasn't seen it: no matter how bad you think it will be, it's actually worse
Now I have to watch it.

User avatar
jsteffe
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#296 Post by jsteffe » Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:19 pm

ari101 wrote:
Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:41 pm
domino harvey wrote:
Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:35 pm
Yep. To anyone who hasn't seen it: no matter how bad you think it will be, it's actually worse
Now I have to watch it.
All These Women is not the worst movie ever made, just one of the least entertaining. It is insufferably arch and unfunny, albeit with stylized sets and costumes in color. The disappointment is all the more bitter because Bergman made some good-to-outstanding comedies before this. You come away with the impression that he hated himself and hated his viewers when he made this film. If forced to choose, I'd rather watch Troll 2 because at least that is fun-bad.

But we will all watch it again because it is Bergman's first film in color, and it's a spiffy new restoration. And we will feel deflated and frustrated afterward.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#297 Post by domino harvey » Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:26 pm

The best thing I can say about it is that it's mercifully short (though it will be slightly longer here now that it's no longer sped up for PAL!)

User avatar
jsteffe
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#298 Post by jsteffe » Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:03 am

As soon as I receive the set, I will watch a double feature of The Serpent's Egg and All These Women to get the gruesome business out of the way and see which of the two is worse. Then I will be free to explore the rest of the set on its own terms, liberated.

User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:14 am

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#299 Post by dda1996a » Sat Oct 27, 2018 6:17 am

The Serpent's Egg is far from awful. It's not very Bergman, but it is an interesting film even if it has many flaws

mteller
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:23 pm

Re: Ingmar Bergman's Cinema

#300 Post by mteller » Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:23 pm

The Touch is a lot worse than Serpent’s Egg

Post Reply